Justice For Arthur Tyler

Perhaps the bleakest fact of all is that the death penalty is imposed not only in a freakish and discriminatory manner, but also in some cases upon defendants who are actually innocent. -Justice William J. Brennan, Jr., 1994

Fast Facts: Why is Arthur Tyler on Death Row

                                                            

Leroy Head, co-defendant, testified against Tyler in return for a plea agreement with the state requiring him to testify against Arthur.

• In regard to discrepancies in his confessions to police. “He explained that he made all up except for one: the one that exculpated Arthur.” (Investigators Stokes & Vickers, 6/8/’89)


• “He stated that he was young [18], and never been in trouble before, and was afraid to go to death row. As such he willingly implicated Arthur at the first trial. (Ibid.)


What happened at the second trial after the Court of Appeals reversed Arthur’s conviction?


• He was coerced. “Prosecutor William Gerstenslager threatened him…[he] made clear to Leroy that one of two things might happen. First he would revoke the deal and make sure Leroy got the death sentence. Or, he would sent Leroy from Lucasville to Marion or Lebanon, and ensure the inmates knew he was a snitch so he would be killed. In light of these threats, Leroy testified the second time.” (Ibid)

• He told me not to mention his threat when I took the stand the following day (Affidavit of Leroy Head 7/29/’91).


Leroy Head claimed responsibility for the shooting 6 times.


• Leroy Head signed 4 confessions in which he claims responsibility for the shooting.

(3/14/’’83; 3/24/’83; 4/15/’85; 4/27/’86).


• Leroy Head claims responsibility for the shooting to investigators 6/8/’89 and in an affidavit (7/29/’91).


What was the extent of Arthur Tyler’s involvement?


• “Arthur Tyler didn’t know what I was doing to the old man. We didn’t plan to rob the old man. I thought of it while I was waiting for Arthur to come out of the store.” (Exhibit D Statement of Leroy Head taken at County Jail 3/24/’83).


What court/ legal actions compromised the verdicts?



• William Gerstenslager, the prosecutor at Arthur’s first trial left the prosecutor’s office to work for the attorneys appointed to handle his appeal. Once the appeal was won, Gerstenslager left the attorney’s firm and became prosecutor at Arthur’s second trial.

The second trail judge appointed the same appeal attorneys to handle the second trial even after being informed that the prosecutor sitting the case had worked for these attorneys during the appeal process.

• The prosecutor’s manipulation of evidence in relation to another trail is a matter or record. William E. Gerstenslager was convicted 8/16/’89 of failing to disclose exculpatory evidence in a rape case in Cuyahoga County and fined $500 plus costs and given a public reprimand.


• During testimony of the defense investigator it was learned that he also worked for Leroy Head’s defense in 1983 before Leroy implicated Arthur.


• During trial Arthur was never called back for questioning when the jury deadlocked. In Ohio law, without unanimous agreement, the death penalty cannot be invoked. In this instance the judge gave the improper Allen charge instructions no longer used in the guilt phase of a trial and required the jury to come up with a clear verdict.


• These and other errors of equal gravity were either never acknowledged by the court or deemed “harmless errors.”


What happened to Leroy Head?


• He was released from prison at the beginning of June 2008.


What is wrong with the system?


• An aggressive County Prosecutor’s Office in the ‘80s resulted in an escalation of death penalty convictions. “Allegations of withheld evidence, even in capital cases, have cropped up time and again from the 1980s” (Plain Dealer, 7/10/’06).


• A plethora of evidence in Tyler’s defense was never brought forth. (See details (Plain Dealer, 7/10/’06).


• Current Prosecutor Bill Mason refused to grant immunity to Leroy Head.



Attorney Comment


• “I have handled five death penalty habeas matters. Only in one has the evidence of a client’s innocence been overwhelming and that client is Arthur Tyler. (Rick Kerger, Attorney) – read article at www.justicedenied. org.


• “Between prosecutors being aggressive and using (the death penalty) as a political tool and us not knowing the law, it was a disaster for criminal defendants.”

( Attorney David Doughton quoted in Prosecutions in ‘80s now face scrutiny, Columbus Dispatch, July 13, 2006).




Leroy’s Mother



* “After approx 3 minutes she [Barbara Head] came out of the room [where she was meeting with her son] crying and saying that he did it.” ( Exhibit A, Police Report 3/14/’83 taken by Detectives Svekric 2057 & Kunz 2411).

*The Plain Dealer has written about Arthur's case in July, 2006. Please google: "Does it Matter Who Pulled The Trigger?" for the full article.



Please write a letter to the Governor’s Office with a copy to the Ohio Attorney General with a request for a response to your letter, requesting an investigation of Tyler’s case. Notify Advocates at the e-mail addresses below so we can keep track of the number of letters sent. Thank you.


Governor Ted Strickland

Riffe Center, 3rd Floor

77 High Street

Columbus, OH 43215-6108



Attorney General Nancy Rogers (Richard Cordray)

30 E. Broad St.

17th Floor

Columbus, OH 43215-3428


For more information on this case and the international campaign work of Advocates for Arthur Tyler: contact Ian Heisey 216-651-1693 /   heisey2140@sbcglobal.netor    Sr. Mary Therese Berry 216-741-7059 tberry2021@sbcglobal.net. Or go to http://www.justiceorarthurtyler. blogspot.com

 

 

 

 

 

Welcome

Recent Blog Entries

by justiceforarthur | 0 comments
by justiceforarthur | 0 comments
by justiceforarthur | 0 comments

Recent Photos

 

Recent Videos

Recent Forum Posts

by justiceforarthur 11 months ago
by justiceforarthur 11 months ago
by justiceforarthur 11 months ago
by justiceforarthur 11 months ago

Albert Camus (1957)

An execution is not simply death. It is just as different from the privation of life as a concentration camp is from prison. It adds to death a rule, a public premeditation known to the future victim, an organization which is itself a source of moral sufferings more terrible than death. Capital punishment is the most premeditated of murders, to which no criminal's deed, however calculated can be compared. For there to be an equivalency, the death penalty would have to punish a criminal who had warned his victim of the date at which he would inflict a horrible death on him and who, from that moment onward, had confined him at his mercy for months. Such a monster is not encountered in private life.

Sister Helen Prejean

 The profound moral question is not, "Do they deserve to die?" but "Do we deserve to kill them?"

Harry A. Blackmun, former U.S. Supreme Court Judge, (1) & (2) Callins v. Collins, 114 S.Ct.1127 (1994); (3) PBS Online NewsHour, 3/5/2004; (4) Herrera v. Collins 506 US 390 (1993).

Of one thing, however, I am certain. Just as an execution without adequate safeguards is unacceptable, so too is an execution when the condemned prisoner can prove that he is innocent. The execution of a person who can show that he is innocent comes perilously close to simple murder.

Sister Helen Prejean

It should be clear that the death penalty does just the opposite of promoting decency and respect for life. It dehumanizes people and promotes murder. It can never be applied fairly.


“I swore never to be silent whenever and wherever human beings endure suffering and humiliation. We must always take sides. . Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented. To remain silent and indifferent is the greatest sin of all.. Elie Wiesel Nobel Prize for Peace in 1986

You just need to be a flea against injustice. Enough committed fleas biting strategically can make even the biggest dog uncomfortable and transform even the biggest nation.

There may be times when we are powerless to prevent injustice, but there must never be a time when we fail to protest.  Elie Wiesel

Martin Luther King

 Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere. We are caught in an inescapable network of mutuality, tied in a single garment of destiny. Whatever affects one directly, affects all indirectly. 

Edmund Burke (attributed)

The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing


Newest Members

freespiritKaren